W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: #241: clarify eval order/interaction of conditional headers

From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:07:28 -0600
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20120712170728.9e578bfa.eric@bisonsystems.net>
Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> What's the reason for sending both header fields when the ETag is
> available? (Trying to understand...)
> 

HTTP 1.0 intermediary back-compat, so I've heard.

-Eric
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2012 23:08:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 12 July 2012 23:08:10 GMT