Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-http-forwarded-05 issue: multiple copies of Forwarded vs comma-separated list

Just responding to the beginning:

> I don't believe that discussion and draft belongs on apps-discuss.
> HTTP belongs here.  [In fact, I'd have to say that apps-discuss is
> turning into an oligarchy with arbitrary specification scope, instead
> of its original intention as a coordination forum amongst the
> individual ADs+WGs that did the real work, but that's another story.]

The draft is not a product of the httpbis working group, but IS a
product of the appsawg working group.  Apps-Discuss is the mailing
list for that working group.  Please re-post your comment there (where
I will agree with it :-) ).  Thanks.

Barry