W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: #364 Capturing more information in the method registry

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:40:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4FF59963.6070501@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-07-05 08:41, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-07-05 02:48, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> So, I'm hearing a lot of agreement on adding idempotency to the registry.
>> Anyone object to that as closing this issue?
>> Cheers,
> Works for me. Hopefully it won't be too much work to figure out all
> values for existing methods :-)
> Best regards, Julian

Also, would it make sense to mention somewhere that for resource that 
support strong ETags, any request can be made idempotent by adding an 
"If-Match" header with that ETag?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 13:41:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 5 July 2012 13:41:30 GMT