W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-08.txt

From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 22:24:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPW_8m7rVzQ1zkY+KD3i2iEbeRJ7P-cUYwE46nCpnBS+1=+Tag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
+1 on listing idempotent. this is _critical_ in assessing the use/impact of
a method. I'm not clear why it's left off the listing.

mca
http://amundsen.com/blog/
http://twitter.com@mamund
http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me




On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:

> On 03.07.2012 00:29, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>>  This draft is a work item of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis
>> Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
>> Method
>> Registrations
>>         Author(s)       : Julian F. Reschke
>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-httpbis-method-**
>> registrations-08.txt
>>         Pages           : 6
>>         Date            : 2012-07-02
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
>>    methods which have been defined in standards-track RFCs before the
>>    IANA HTTP Method Registry was established.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/**doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-**
>> registrations<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations>
>>
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/**draft-ietf-httpbis-method-**registrations-08<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-08>
>>
>> A diff from previous version is available at:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?**url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-**
>> method-registrations-08<http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-08>
>>
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-**drafts/<ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/>
>>
>
> Thank you for that.
>
> I just wish the registry recorded the other properties we request as
> considerations for new headers. eg. idempotent=yes/no. Not just safe=yes/no.
>
> AYJ
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 02:24:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2012 02:24:51 GMT