W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ?

From: tom <zs68j2ee@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:05:08 +0800
Message-ID: <CAEXHaur2Uuu-pJzCJm+pcr_=dDRT3PPBnM7SGpZSym=x1nnUvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To carry HTTP over UDP is what we are studying on. the goa is to setup P2P
topology within browsers for next web.

HTTP need a underhood reliable transport like TCP/SCTP. Run HTTP over the
multiple reliable transport should be reasonable.

Best regards
  Tom

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

>
> On 25/03/2012, at 2:39 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> > In message <4F6F0DE9.9080307@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
> >> On 2012-03-25 14:14, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> >>> But this semantic outrage does not answer my very simple
> >>> question: Will HTTP/2.0 support only one or will it support
> >>> multiple protocols ?
> >>
> >> I believe the answer is: we don't know yet.
> >
> > So shouldn't we find out, so that people know what they are
> > aiming for with their I-D's ?
>
> If you have requirements and arguments to back them up, please put them
> into a form that's helpful (e.g., an I-D, or just more detail on-list if
> need be). The point of the process is to have this discussion, not to
> "gold-plate" anything.
>
>
> > I personally have a hard time seeing how we can ever bend the world
> > to come to a conclusion that HTTP/2.0 will be single-protocol, given
> > the HTTP/1.1 interop issue, but I am willing to be educated, if
> > somebody has good arguments for that position.
>
> What do you want from "multi-protocol" -- is it "protocol independence"?
> I.e., the ability to swap one for the other without anyone noticing?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham
> http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2012 14:05:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:57 GMT