W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: #247 and Registry policies

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:50:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4F566AA3.2040208@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2012-03-06 20:43, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> On 06/03/2012, at 7:00 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>> My point being: when you say
>>
>>   "... with the notion that if there are commonly-used values that haven't gone through IETF Review, they can be written up in a quick I-D and registered as Reserved."
>>
>> Do you *really* mean that is sufficient to write an ID, and *not* get it published as RFC?
>
> No.

OK. But then I still don't understand the proposal:


> Standard / Reserved / Obsolete
>
> ... with the notion that if there are commonly-used values that haven't gone through IETF Review, they can be written up in a quick I-D and registered as Reserved.

If somebody writes that I-D and gets it published, why wouldn't the 
state then not be "Standard"?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 19:51:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:56 GMT