W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: #227: HEAD and Caches

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:52:54 +0100
Message-ID: <1330714374.1807.62.camel@home.hno.se>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
fre 2012-03-02 klockan 12:24 +0100 skrev Willy Tarreau:
> Even if it's not specified, maybe we should have one line which says that
> it's valid to use GET where HEAD was expected if the client finds any
> benefit in doing so. Well, maybe we already have it, it's just that I
> have not actively looked for this.

It is not explicitly stated. But not sure it's needed.

The specs is pretty clear on how HEAD and GET (do not) differ. 

Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 18:53:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:01 UTC