On 02/03/2012, at 7:01 PM, Erlend Hamnaberg wrote: > Copy/paste bug in the following paragraph? > > + <t>use other header fields provided in the 304 response to replace > + all instances of the corresponding header fields in the stored > + response.</t> > + </list> > +</t> > + > </section> > > +</section> > + > <section anchor="invalidation.after.updates.or.deletions" > title="Request Methods that Invalidate"> > <t> Ah, yes - thanks. > Good clarifications. > > In a related note: Is it allowed for a cache to rewrite a HEAD request to a GET if there previously is no entity stored for that request? > Maybe there should be some text on that, or is that an implementation detail? It certainly isn't prohibited, but I tend to think that's an optimisation, not a specified behaviour. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 10:10:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:56 GMT