W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Idempotent partial updates

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:46:22 +0100
Message-ID: <1330551982.24673.57.camel@home.hno.se>
To: Mike Kelly <mikekelly321@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
ons 2012-02-29 klockan 19:59 +0000 skrev Mike Kelly:

> Right, it is closely coupled - as is any other interaction driven by
> shared understanding between the client and the server. Not everything
> needs, or can be, visible on the network and is better off dealt with
> via shared understanding between client and server. What is it about
> the non-partial'ness of PUT that requires it to be made visible by
> HTTP across the web as a whole?

Simply the fact that HTTP/1.x do not allow upgrades of defined methods
in this manner.

If this "partial PUT" is sent to a server that do not understand it
would result in breakage, therefore it can not be accepted as an
extension of the existing PUT method. Instead it needs to use a new
method, making sure that breakage do not occur if the request is
attepmted somewhere where it's not supported.

Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 21:50:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:00 UTC