W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: RFC format - time for an update?

From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:11:36 +1300
Message-ID: <4F3CBA38.2030807@qbik.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

ok thanks

nice to know I'm not alone



On 16/02/2012 8:57 p.m., Carsten Bormann wrote:
> TL;DR answer: no.
> Long answer: There is a raging debate about this about once a year, often on the main IETF mailing list, making that unusable for about two weeks in a row.
> Each time, the result is to stick with the RFC format.
>> Most other standards bodies seem to have adopted a rich text format.
> Yes.  We are different.
> (In many ways, not just this one, but definitely in this one.)
> Most definitely don't debate it here.
> Gre, Carsten

Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 08:12:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:56 GMT