Yes, I can add that into the example. On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: [snip] >> >> Can you clarify the meaning of an ETag header returned in the >> response to a PUT with a Prefer:return-representation header. Would >> that ETag refer to the resource whose representation is being >> returned? > > > If it does not something is badly broken. HTTPbis part 4 section 2.3: > " > 2.3. ETag > > The ETag header field provides the current entity-tag for the > selected representation. > > " > >> If so, could we please include ETag in the example. If not, >> then we really need a way to get the actual ETag for the returned >> representation - otherwise Prefer:return-representation is not that >> useful. > > > +1. > > AYJ >Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 15:58:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:55 GMT