W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Informal Last Call for HTTP Preference Header

From: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 07:54:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CABP7RbduOzaRbUAEw3rWcb_NE6k9fUGa2bW1CSE0i+A3pnmTRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Yes, I can add that into the example.

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Can you clarify the meaning of an ETag header returned in the
>> response to a PUT with a Prefer:return-representation header. Would
>> that ETag refer to the resource whose representation is being
>> returned?
>
>
> If it does not something is badly broken. HTTPbis part 4 section 2.3:
> "
> 2.3. ETag
>
>   The ETag header field provides the current entity-tag for the
>   selected representation.
>
> "
>
>> If so, could we please include ETag in the example. If not,
>> then we really need a way to get the actual ETag for the returned
>> representation - otherwise Prefer:return-representation is not that
>> useful.
>
>
> +1.
>
> AYJ
>
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 15:58:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:55 GMT