W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: #335, was: obs-fold

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:18:31 +1100
Cc: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <09E48240-7BCF-4F9F-B994-B1E285C54EB2@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
I think "field-value" would work...


On 01/02/2012, at 8:00 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2012-01-30 01:14, Zhong Yu wrote:
>> p1 section 3.2.1.
>> 
>>    HTTP senders MUST NOT produce messages that include
>>    line folding (i.e., that contain any #field-content# that matches the
>>    obs-fold rule)
>> 
>> shouldn't that be
>> 
>>    HTTP senders MUST NOT produce messages that include
>>    line folding (i.e., that contain any #header-field# that matches the
>>    obs-fold rule)
>> 
>> instead?
>> 
>>      OWS            = *( SP / HTAB / obs-fold )
>>      BWS            = OWS
>> 
>>      header-field   = field-name ":" OWS field-value BWS
>>      field-name     = token
>>      field-value    = *( field-content / obs-fold )
>>      field-content  = *( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
> 
> Minimally, this is phrased confusingly. Not being sure what the best fix is, I opened a ticket: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/335>
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 01:24:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:55 GMT