W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012


From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:03:38 +1100
Message-Id: <99C2C1C5-2CF3-4967-A5D9-F2705D580F8A@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Right now, this is all we say about chunk-extensions (beyond the BNF, etc.):

>    All HTTP/1.1 applications MUST be able to receive and decode the
>    "chunked" transfer-coding and MUST ignore chunk-ext extensions they
>    do not understand.

Since this is an extensibility point, we should give guidance on how it should be used. 

I can't really see establishing a chunk-extension registry; they don't have any semantic, and AFAIK haven't really been used in anger.

What do people think about adding advice along these lines:

Use of chunk-extensions by senders is deprecated; they SHOULD NOT be sent and definition of new chunk-extensions is discouraged.


Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 01:09:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:00 UTC