2012/2/6 Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>: > lör 2012-01-28 klockan 11:50 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke: > >> I *agree* with improving the layering, and maybe giving the transport >> layer a specific name, but "HTTP/2.0" it can't be. > > My vision of HTTP/2.0 is .. > I do not see a great need for a new semantic model. But several things > that need to change on the wire to provide a robust & efficient protocol > that can be built upon for the next several decades. FWIW - this is pretty much exactly what I'd like to see as well, both wearing my squid hat, and my 'runs a complex web environment with stacked accelerators, caches, heterogeneous appservers etc' hat on. -RobReceived on Monday, 6 February 2012 20:17:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:54 GMT