W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Confusion in preconditions

From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:59:31 -0700
To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastien Lambla <seb@serialseb.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20120201005931.0902f663.eric@bisonsystems.net>
Zhong Yu wrote:
> One must wonder, the problem of conditionals appears to be very easy.
> We can have a simple model and a simple procedure, that succinctly and
> precisely defines behaviors in any scenario.

I've suggested changing the document order around and trimming the
wording down, this also seems like issue 241:


> Why does the spec instead "beat around the bush", going very
> roundabout ways, only setting some constraints on some scenarios? Are
> readers supposed to solve the riddles to learn the underlying model?

Nonetheless, I didn't find it all that hard to write working code, and
I'm not much of a coder.  Coming up with alternate spec language is

Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 08:00:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:00 UTC