On 2012-01-31 19:28, Arnaud Quillaud wrote: > Hello, > > The content-disposition header is defined in RFC6266: > << > > The Content-Disposition response header field is used to convey > additional information about how to process the response payload, and > also can be used to attach additional metadata, such as the filename > to use when saving the response payload locally. > >>> > > This definition was inherited from RFC2616 and remains silent on the use > of this header in HTTP *requests* although it seems like a natural fit > in operations like WebDAV PUT (or AtomPUB POST). Is this an oversight ? Not really; RFC 2616 defines it as response header as well. > Thanks, > > Arnaud Quillaud > > PS: it looks like some WebDAV-like services are actually accepting this > header in requests already (see > https://developers.google.com/storage/docs/reference-headers#contentdisposition > or > http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/2006-03-01/API/RESTObjectPUT.html > ). We could relax the definition in RFC6266bis. In the meantime, experiments like the ones you mentioned are definitively useful. Best regards, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 21:11:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:54 GMT