W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:39:28 +0100
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <lbhei7t4229ed7j65v7ggli1nfg2pu59tl@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* Julian Reschke wrote:
>On 2012-01-30 12:17, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> Don't repeat so much of / so literally the Abstract in the Introduction,
>> it's confusing to read the duplicate.
>
>I like it that way :-)

I can understand it's annoying to phrase them differently, and while
Agent Smith might not be around the next corner, but "What, I just
read that" is very distracting nevertheless.

>Or we could revise RFC 2617's definition of "Basic" and move it into a 
>separate document. Technically that would be the cleanest approach, but 
>I fear that doing so would summon those who insist on a complete fix for 
>all HTTP security issues.

Looking at the recent xml-dev thread on Basic, this seems indeed likely.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 01:39:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:54 GMT