W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: HTTbis spec size, was: Rechartering HTTPbis

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:54:59 +0000
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2148.1327751699@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <4F23DF7E.1030809@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:

>> Those are all things being transported, just like GET, PUT and 200
>> are and they are no different from a transport point of view, should
>> not be treated any different from a transport point of view, and
>> their interpretation and semantics should be standardized separately
>> from the transport, just like GET, PUT and 200.
>
>Yes. People have known these to be defined by "HTTP" for ~20 years now. 
>I see no reason to change that.

As I said:  I'm not keen on calling anything HTTP/2.0

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 11:55:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:53 GMT