W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Rechartering HTTPbis

From: Jose Mathew Manimala <josemanimala@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:27:24 +0000
Message-ID: 1170603313-1327717645-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-324400599-@b28.c13.bise7.blackberry>
To: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>,ietf-http-wg@w3.org
The reply cleared up my question, thank you for the reply :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:20:15 
To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Rechartering HTTPbis

On 27/01/2012 3:56 p.m., Jose Mathew Manimala wrote:
> Just a random question, will 2.0 support secure sockets the same way as 1.1 and will there be any causes for concern over how ssl is to be implemented for 2.0?

What do you mean "same way"?

Several of us want to kill CONNECT in it scurrent incarnation, but 
Upgrade: is pretty much mandatory for 2.0 to rollout across 1.x.

Port 443 has always just been HTTP-over-TLS protocol. Irrelevant which 
version of HTTP was being sent over the encrypted tunnel. I personally 
doubt that would change.

Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 02:27:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:00 UTC