W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: #332, was: Redirect fallback requirements

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:56:30 +1100
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9DBBB0A8-F841-414B-9921-5E5D9B3B14CA@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On 25/01/2012, at 5:18 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2012-01-19 18:57, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Indeed; I forgot that I was cross-posting :-)
>> 
>> I have raised this point as
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/332>.
> 
> In the meantime I made a small change to HTTPbis P2, which still called 307 "a new status code". The advice on the response body is now the same as for 302.
> 
> See <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1508>.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 

+1, I think that's a resolution to 322.

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:57:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:53 GMT