W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: [p2-semantics] Method Definitions - PATCH?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:10:26 +0100
Message-ID: <4F1878B2.3080304@gmx.de>
To: Ray Polk <raypolk@gmail.com>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-01-19 21:01, Ray Polk wrote:
> My question is:  should/does the HTTP spec absorb the most widely
> accepted of these separately defined methods?

No.

> put another way:  should this group anoint the most widely used of the
> methods from that registry as first class HTTP methods?

There are no different classes.

> It seems like such a thing would help with adoption.

All we can tell people is that it doesn't matter where the method is 
defined.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2012 20:11:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:53 GMT