W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: WGLC #357: Authentication Exchanges

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:57:37 +1000
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <D5C84FCD-BE27-4D0F-9D39-8460DB93BD01@mnot.net>
To: Yutaka OIWA <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp>

On 20/06/2012, at 9:31 PM, Yutaka OIWA wrote:

> Dear Mark,
> 
> 2012/6/20 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>:
> 
>> That's effectively where we are; note that there aren't any RFC2119 conformance requirements placed around this.
> 
> I prefer to be explicit that use of 403 is just a preference
> and is not RFC2119 nor other "requirements".
> "Ought-to" sounds to be louder than RECOMMENDED, as a natural language.
> # correct me if I have an English problem.

We've consistently used "ought to" to give advice and encourage certain behaviours without making it a conformance requirement (thereby breaking existing implementations). The normative requirements are expressed (and always have been) in RFC2119 language. 


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 23:58:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 20 June 2012 23:58:19 GMT