With apologies to MNot for ignoring his opinion (which I generally agree with) about not picking particular status values; but in this case I yielded to temptation. rfc2xml output at http://www.tbray.org/tmp/draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status.html -T ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:33 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status-00.txt To: tbray@textuality.com A new version of I-D, draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Tim Bray and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status Revision: 00 Title: A New HTTP Status Code for Legally-restricted Resources Creation date: 2012-06-11 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 5 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status-00.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/submission.filename }}-00 Abstract: This document specifies an additional Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) status code for use when resource access is denied for legal reasons. The IETF SecretariatReceived on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 01:37:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 June 2012 01:37:11 GMT