W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Status code for censorship?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:45:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4FD620A8.3080706@gmx.de>
To: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-06-11 18:30, Martin Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:03:15 +0200, Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> On 2012-06-11 17:54, James M Snell wrote:
>>> I can definitely live with that.. anything that increases the
>>> visibility of censorship is not a bad thing.  Looks like status code
>>> 427 is open currently.
>>> ...
>>
>> So is 418. In any case, if we go there it should be 451.
>>
>
> 450 is used by Microsoft for parental control blocking, so it makes
> sense for more than one reason.

Good to know.

Friends @MSFT: how about writing a spec?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 16:46:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 11 June 2012 16:46:09 GMT