Re: Status code for censorship?

On 2012-06-11 18:30, Martin Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:03:15 +0200, Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> On 2012-06-11 17:54, James M Snell wrote:
>>> I can definitely live with that.. anything that increases the
>>> visibility of censorship is not a bad thing.  Looks like status code
>>> 427 is open currently.
>>> ...
>>
>> So is 418. In any case, if we go there it should be 451.
>>
>
> 450 is used by Microsoft for parental control blocking, so it makes
> sense for more than one reason.

Good to know.

Friends @MSFT: how about writing a spec?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 16:46:04 UTC