- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:07:02 +0200
- To: "William A. Rowe Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-06-07 20:11, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 6/7/2012 12:52 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2012-06-07 19:50, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>> Reviewing http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-07 >>> I noted that the Appendix A is missing the normative list of RFC-2616 original >>> methods. These are certainly in-scope, per the Introduction, no? >>> ... >> >> Those will be registered through >> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-19.html#method.registration>; >> this draft is only for the non-base ones... > > Understood. The introduction states; > > 1. Introduction > > This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) > methods which have been defined in standards-track RFCs before the > IANA HTTP Method Registry was established. > > Clearly the original RFC 2616 methods conform to that statement; can this > please be clarified in the introduction? Fixed by adding "...other than [draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics] ...". Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:08:09 UTC