W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: httpbis-method-registrations

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:07:02 +0200
Message-ID: <4FD0FBD6.10000@gmx.de>
To: "William A. Rowe Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-06-07 20:11, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 6/7/2012 12:52 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2012-06-07 19:50, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>> Reviewing http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-07
>>> I noted that the Appendix A is missing the normative list of RFC-2616 original
>>> methods.  These are certainly in-scope, per the Introduction, no?
>>> ...
>>
>> Those will be registered through
>> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-19.html#method.registration>;
>> this draft is only for the non-base ones...
>
> Understood.  The introduction states;
>
> 1. Introduction
>
>     This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
>     methods which have been defined in standards-track RFCs before the
>     IANA HTTP Method Registry was established.
>
> Clearly the original RFC 2616 methods conform to that statement; can this
> please be clarified in the introduction?

Fixed by adding "...other than [draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics] ...".

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:08:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 June 2012 19:08:17 GMT