W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Some thoughts on server push and client pull

From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:56:39 -0600
Message-ID: <4FD0DD47.2010907@stpeter.im>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 6/7/12 10:54 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 7 June 2012 09:43, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
>> * Google is working on efforts to seriously deploy SPDY server push on our
>> properties. I can't comment further on timeline, but I hope to provide data
>> to guide our discussions, so let's not axe it just yet.
>> * To my knowledge, Amazon is using it in their Silk browser. A proxy that
>> uses server push is a fascinating use case, and it'd be cool to get data on
>> that first.
> 
> I'm with Mike and Gabriel on this one.
> 
> It would be nice if HTTP/2.0 discussions could be scoped to exclude
> discussions on new protocol semantics.  If you feel especially
> attached to the idea of push, then my preference would be to see a new
> draft on it.

+1

/psa
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 16:57:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 June 2012 16:57:16 GMT