- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:56:39 -0600
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 6/7/12 10:54 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 7 June 2012 09:43, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote: >> * Google is working on efforts to seriously deploy SPDY server push on our >> properties. I can't comment further on timeline, but I hope to provide data >> to guide our discussions, so let's not axe it just yet. >> * To my knowledge, Amazon is using it in their Silk browser. A proxy that >> uses server push is a fascinating use case, and it'd be cool to get data on >> that first. > > I'm with Mike and Gabriel on this one. > > It would be nice if HTTP/2.0 discussions could be scoped to exclude > discussions on new protocol semantics. If you feel especially > attached to the idea of push, then my preference would be to see a new > draft on it. +1 /psa
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 16:57:10 UTC