W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Some thoughts on server push and client pull

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:54:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWuB-h0rBOTnuS2abFhiTtkHi0zcDM=gtVc9K7_OS8e2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 7 June 2012 09:43, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
> * Google is working on efforts to seriously deploy SPDY server push on our
> properties. I can't comment further on timeline, but I hope to provide data
> to guide our discussions, so let's not axe it just yet.
> * To my knowledge, Amazon is using it in their Silk browser. A proxy that
> uses server push is a fascinating use case, and it'd be cool to get data on
> that first.

I'm with Mike and Gabriel on this one.

It would be nice if HTTP/2.0 discussions could be scoped to exclude
discussions on new protocol semantics.  If you feel especially
attached to the idea of push, then my preference would be to see a new
draft on it.

--Martin
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 16:55:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 June 2012 16:55:08 GMT