W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Fwd: WGLC: draft-ietf-appsawg-http-forwarded-02.txt - section 5.1

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 14:32:59 +1200
To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <aae9c9339c5d775b57e0371b609b9334@treenet.co.nz>
On 02.05.2012 11:33, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> HTTP folk,
>
> Please have a look at this document and send along comments,
> especially if you're an intermediary or firewall person, or consume
> the existing X-Forwarded-For header.
>
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-http-forwarded-02>
>
> Cheers,
>


** section 5.1, must it be an interface label?

what about interception ports where the TCP details are not related to 
the interface in any way and both details needed?
what about interfaces labelled with non-alphanumeric characters?


AYJ
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 02:33:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 May 2012 02:33:31 GMT