W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

WGLC issue: P4 - ETags & conditional requests

From: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:47:46 +0100
Message-Id: <B5E63193-2450-41AD-A3AA-047755F2189D@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Cc: John Sullivan <jsullivan@velocix.com>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi,

Apologies that this mail misses the WG LC deadline, in Velocix we're reviewing all the HTTPBIS documents but we're a little behind, hence the late comments, sorry. (we're still reviewing so might have more comments as we work through the documents)

On page 14 of P4 it states:

   If none of the entity-tags match, or if "*" is given and no current
   representation exists, the server MUST NOT perform the requested
   method.  Instead, the server MUST respond with the 412 (Precondition
   Failed) status code.

This appears to apply to intermediates, but If-Match has a problem
here that If-Unmodified-Since does not. If a proxy has a cached
entity which has a newer Last-Modified timestamp it *knows* that
the conditional has failed and can generate the required
412 Precondition Failed response itself. Otherwise it can satisfy
the request from cache. Or relay if there is no current cached
version.

But because multiple responses with different ETags may exist then a cache receiving If-Match with one etag, when it has a different etag cached, can not know for sure that the request etag does not exist. If it were to respond with a 412 status it would effectively be preventing the use of that conditional.

It would appear that the only two options available to an intermediate are to satisfy the request in the case of a known match, and relay upstream in all other cases (which would be in conflict with the spec as quoted above).

Thanks
Ben
Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 17:48:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:52:00 GMT