W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: SPDY = HTTP/2.0 or not ?

From: Ray <ray.polk@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 05:26:46 -0600
Message-Id: <E7C77DAA-6E54-4F11-B7BA-EE4C78FAD90F@oracle.com>
Cc: Alexandre Morgaut <Alexandre.Morgaut@4d.com>, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, Christopher Müller <christopher.mueller@itec.uni-klu.ac.at>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To: Stefan Lederer <stefan.lederer@aau.at>
<conspiracyTheory>
...and give a huge speed advantage to a company wealthy enough to configure their own edge caching infrastructure?  thus massively increasing barrier to entry for upstart competition?
</conspiracyTheory>  :o 

*spins his rolodex to anti-trust lawyers*

On Apr 4, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Stefan Lederer <stefan.lederer@aau.at> wrote:

>>> It is a different layer of the social interaction using HTTP.
>>> DRM == protect the producer
>>> SSL == protect the user
>>> 
>> with client certificates, SSL can somehow also protect the producer ;-)
> 
> Another problem when using SSL for HTTP video streams is that caches cannot
> be used very efficiently. This would introduce problems/higher costs in
> content distribution, etc. 
> 
> Best Regards
> Stefan Lederer
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2012 11:28:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:59 GMT