W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: multiplexing -- don't do it

From: J Ross Nicoll <jrn@jrn.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:10:48 +0100
Message-ID: <4F7AB088.9010402@jrn.me.uk>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 03/04/2012 02:55, Adrien W. de Croy wrote:
> OK, thanks for pointing that out.
> We are at a slightly different juncture than we were in 2000.
> It seems to me, the issue of mandatory SSL is far from put to rest.
> In relation to RFC2804, it's one thing to take a position of not 
> taking a position, which is fine and completely reasonable.
> It's another to promote a protocol that explicitly goes against the 
> wishes of governments, and therefore creates problems for 
> implementors, potentially criminalises users and implementors.  Thats 
> doesn't equate to not taking a position.

On a related note, has everyone seen the UK government is considering 
laws requiring acccess to monitor Internet communication? "The 
government will be able to monitor the calls, emails, texts and website 
visits of everyone in the UK under new legislation set to be announced 
soon." - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17576745

Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 08:11:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:02 UTC