I'm curious if under your definition of "http router" that box is terminating the ssl connection and forwarding to different backends or if you are speaking about the non-ssl case. On Apr 2, 2012 3:20 PM, "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > In message <CAA4WUYg79y39s3M= > NpuUSATJQGSFJvE_PKz+rW3ZGeWbUkcQjg@mail.gmail.com> > , =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= writes: > > >It's unclear to me the point that you're making. Above, Peter said "Since > a > >SPDY session is associated with a single TCP connection, we can assume all > >GETs on that connection are being routed to the same web server." to which > >you said "I think that is an unwarranted assumption." > > > >So, just to clarify, we're on agreement that all GETs are being routed to > >the same HTTP router, right? > > Yes, they go to the same HTTP router, but very likely different > HTTP servers. > > I strongly belive that we need to recognize HTTP routers as a class > in HTTP/2.0, a class semi-distinct from the more general proxy, > because they handle the biggest bandwidths and look at the smallest > parts of the HTTP headers. > > Proxies with more functionality, caching or filtering for instance > by definition needs to look at more of the metadata becuase they > are, at some level, involved in the semantics. > > But the basic HTTP-router just needs to figure out which webserver > this goes to and the primary criteria seems to be: > Host: > URI pattern match > session-cookie > in that order. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > >Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 14:17:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:59 GMT