W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Protocols, extensions, compatibility

From: (wrong string) 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 23:11:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYh6bdJLop0soo_RPfZJx_6rXaD_Bx8R+qmREn5ZWSWNbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
FWIW, Chromium has run live user experiments testing performance with
different per-host connection limits. Our current connection per host limit
(6) reflects what we believe to be the most performant.

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:44:45PM -0400, Peter Lepeska wrote:
> > Watching this video, Patrick McManus makes a great point about increasing
> > connections increases the likelihood that SYNs and SYN-ACKs will get
> > dropped. That's a very convincing argument for me AGAINST my suggestion
> to
> > simply increase the per host limit.
> >
> > Thanks for sending the link,
> I agree with him on this too, and for having run tests with very large
> per-host limits one year ago, I can say that these losses *do* happen.
> What's worse is that they generally don't happen below a certain limit,
> and that they happen by batches when you go beyond that limit. Of course,
> this limit depends on the network between the two TCP endpoints and its
> load and there is no real way to guess it.
> Willy
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 21:12:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:02 UTC