- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:06:48 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "<ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <20120401090052.GR14039@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >> One of the really big problems with HTTP/1.1 in that respect, is the >> lack of a session-concept, which people hack around with cookies. >> >> HTTP/2.0 should have real sessions, so that HTTP-routers don't have >> to inspect and mangle cookies. > >[...] >I think it would be useful to have a TCP extension to transport such >application session information (that's out of the scope of this WG). I'm not sure I see how that would work, if a proxy of some kind connects to a server, there will be multiple sessions in the same TCP connection. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 09:07:12 UTC