- From: Mike Kelly <mikekelly321@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:38:28 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, REST-Discuss Discussion Group <rest-discuss@yahoogroups.com>
Nice one thanks Mark, +1 to all of that post What do you think about handling the negotiation via HTTP? Cheers, Mike On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Some thoughts along vaguely similar lines - > > http://www.mnot.net/blog/2011/08/28/better_browser_caching > > Cheers, > > > On 15/12/2011, at 7:16 AM, Mike Kelly wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is anyone aware of any proposals that extend HTTP to allow servers and >> clients to negotiate client-side storage allocation for client-side >> (private) caches? >> >> Basically, I'm looking for a way for a server to indicate how much >> storage should be allocated for caching responses from a particular >> domain name, and possibly also for the client to be able to indicate >> how much allocation was actually possible. >> >> Aside from that, if you have any thoughts on whether or not this is >> really feasible or is just a plain bad idea - please let me know >> >> Thanks, >> Mike >> > > -- > Mark Nottingham > http://www.mnot.net/ > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 23:05:10 UTC