W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Negotiated private cache storage allocation

From: Mike Kelly <mikekelly321@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:38:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CANqiZJakWL8CRi744pD_ONNksDbG9_ajK=uyJmjoDrq1dFJknQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, REST-Discuss Discussion Group <rest-discuss@yahoogroups.com>
Nice one thanks Mark, +1 to all of that post

What do you think about handling the negotiation via HTTP?

Cheers,
Mike

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Some thoughts along vaguely similar lines -
>
> http://www.mnot.net/blog/2011/08/28/better_browser_caching
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On 15/12/2011, at 7:16 AM, Mike Kelly wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is anyone aware of any proposals that extend HTTP to allow servers and
>> clients to negotiate client-side storage allocation for client-side
>> (private) caches?
>>
>> Basically, I'm looking for a way for a server to indicate how much
>> storage should be allocated for caching responses from a particular
>> domain name, and possibly also for the client to be able to indicate
>> how much allocation was actually possible.
>>
>> Aside from that, if you have any thoughts on whether or not this is
>> really feasible or is just a plain bad idea - please let me know
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham
> http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 23:05:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:51 GMT