- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:41:19 +0100
- To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi Alex, On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 08:25:25AM -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote: (...) > Please note that both approaches will require introduction of new > normative vocabulary. AFAICT, we currently do not have any normative > language that clearly distinguishes "generation" from "forwarding" in > the context of "sending". That has to be fixed regardless of the > approach. Otherwise, proxy developers will continue to misinterpret > "send" and "sender" rules. > > I have proposed specific wording for the "global exception for proxies" > approach. If there is consensus that the first approach is the way to > go, I would be happy to try to reshape that proposal to just introduce > the necessary generation/forwarding vocabulary. I think that if we carefully define what a "sender" is and what "send" means, we can avoid the global exception without rewriting every MUST rule, because after all the base of the problem lies there. Regards, Willy
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 15:42:00 UTC