Re: clarify some MUST requirements in HTTPbis part 1 section 3.3

On Dec 7, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Right. So, back to the questions above -- what is a HTTP proxy supposed to do in these situations? Should this specific requirement be relaxed?

Yes, that's what I said earlier -- it is a bug to say that the field-value
MUST be sent in a specific form when senders are not expected to rewrite
the field-value, and might actually be forbidden from doing so by other
requirements.  What it is supposed to say is that newly generated Date
field-values MUST be of the standard form.

....Roy