- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:31:33 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-12-07 16:22, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:57:48 +0100, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> My understanding is that it depends, and needs to decided on a >> per-header basis. We can try classifications that make it easier to >> decide, and we may even be able to recommend a default, but this will >> break when a new header needs the non-default behavior. > > I don't think that will work for us. It needs to be the same > irrespective of the header. Or some kind of fixed unchanging list for > which things is different. > ... Well, it seems that "what it needs to be" is not compatible with how HTTP works. I have no idea how to address this kind of requirement. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 15:32:05 UTC