W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Protocols/APIs and redirects

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:31:33 +0100
Message-ID: <4EDF86D5.4030607@gmx.de>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-12-07 16:22, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:57:48 +0100, Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> My understanding is that it depends, and needs to decided on a
>> per-header basis. We can try classifications that make it easier to
>> decide, and we may even be able to recommend a default, but this will
>> break when a new header needs the non-default behavior.
>
> I don't think that will work for us. It needs to be the same
> irrespective of the header. Or some kind of fixed unchanging list for
> which things is different.
> ...

Well, it seems that "what it needs to be" is not compatible with how 
HTTP works. I have no idea how to address this kind of requirement.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 15:32:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:50 GMT