W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Protocols/APIs and redirects

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:53:54 +0100
To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "HTTP WG" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v535r5iz64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:42:50 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Sorry, Anne; I couldn't find it either, so I've just created  
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/328>.
> The discussion wound up here:  
> <http://www.w3.org/mid/op.vygkyybt64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>. As  
> others have mentioned, I don't think there's much we can say about this,  
> other than mentioning it as something that people who define new headers  
> should consider.

Is that another way of saying we should define the behavior in the HTML  
fetch algorithm?

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 09:54:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:50 GMT