- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:02:36 +1100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Can we leave the reference to the retry-after header def (line 2282)? Cheers, On 03/12/2011, at 8:08 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-12-02 23:21, Julian Reschke wrote: >> ... >> Sorry, me confused about two different headers. >> >> We did not change 413, as 431 was on the table. >> >> We *did* extend 503, and this can be backed out if we get 429. >> ... > > Proposed change: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/255/255.diff> -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 01:03:17 UTC