W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: SHOULD-level requirements in p6-caching

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 10:57:25 +0100
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20111105095725.GB5902@1wt.eu>
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 08:49:50PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Willy,
> 
> Again -- this is about Warn-codes, NOT status codes.

Arghh... Sorry Mark, I always get trapped in this. I think it's the syntax
which systematically makes me believe it's a status code which indicates
a warning. In fact, taken out of context, it's easy to get fooled I think,
especially since the warn codes cleanly intersect with status codes without
conflict.

Cheers,
Willy
Received on Saturday, 5 November 2011 10:00:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:50 GMT