W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: #312: should there be a permanent variant of 307?

From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:12:31 +1300
Message-ID: <4EAB7D2F.30806@qbik.com>
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

I've seen chrome behave differently for 301 than 302, e.g. not even do 
the original request, but straight to the previously diverted one.  E.g. 
a permanent redirect.


On 29/10/2011 2:29 p.m., Mark Baker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Yves Lafon<ylafon@w3.org>  wrote:
>> First thing is... was 301 ever used to change entries in a bookmark or a
>> link in a page?
> It's been discussed for ages, but I'm not aware of any user agent which does it.
>
> e.g. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8648
>
> Mark.
>

-- 
Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2011 04:13:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:49 GMT