W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: I-D draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 23:19:13 +0000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <2940.1317943153@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <2a1159da8e681e616476b4aef7ed14be@mail.mxes.net>, Mark Nottingham wr
ites:
>On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:12:13 +0200, Andreas Petersson wrote:
>> On 10/5/11 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> In message <20111005123338.320c38d4@hetzer>, Andreas Petersson 
>>> writes:
>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt
>>>>
>>>> Please comment.
>>>
>>> ]       proto-kv   = "proto=" ( "http" | "https" )
>>>
>>> Given Speedy, Websockets and other such experiments, shouldn't this
>>> allow any protocol-name ?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I guess that sounds quite reasonable. But will every protocol
>> always only have one unique name, that everyone would use, without 
>> need
>> for discussion?
>>
>> Another, perhaps a non-issue, would be name changes (somewhat like
>> jabber vs. xmpp or yp vs. nis).
>
>Maybe establish a (lightweight!) registry? Or is there one already?

As in:

]       proto-kv   = "proto=" ( "http" | "https" | x-token )
]	x-token	   = "X-" node

?


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 23:19:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:48 GMT