- From: Bill Burke <bburke@redhat.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:37:28 +0000
- To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
- CC: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 3/29/11 4:19 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > Just to make sure we have a clear base for discussion: DOSETA is not DKIM. > > DKIM is a fully-integrated email identification scheme. > > Although DOSETA documents the same core technology, the specification is > organized very differently and is intended to be easy to adapt to other > applications. > > The DOSETA documents are also is newer and very much subject to changes > (improvements). These documents are only a few weeks old, although of > course, much of the text was taken from the older and more mature DKIM > specifications. > > To put things baldly: I made an initial pass at organizing the DOSETA > spec in a way that would support much better modularization, to support > use in other application. But like any writing I do, it needs others to > suggest changes. By "needs" I mean /must/ be obtained. I'm quite happy > with the current version... as a start. It needs other eyes and some > testing to provide guidance for how to make it better, in terms of > organization, technical design, and wording. > Is there a specific mail list you discuss DOSETA on? I'd like to join the conversation or at least listen. At a minimum I can provide feedback from implementing, integrating, and applying the protocol. -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat http://bill.burkecentral.com
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 09:25:21 UTC