W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: I-D Action:draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:33:39 +0200
Cc: httpbis mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <9F31297B-DED8-487C-AF5E-09442CCD9157@mnot.net>
To: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sitting here with Roy, who's asking much the same question. James, I know there was a discussion about this a while back, but it's new to many; can you give an overview?

Cheers,


On 29/03/2011, at 11:31 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <B27105DD-AFD1-451C-B9D7-ED79888A657B@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri
> tes:
> 
>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt
> 
> Couldt we please try to make it a habit to include some kind of use-case
> or justification for these "bolt-on" drafts ?
> 
> It's probably my imagination that is flawed, but the only mental connection
> I can attach to this draft is RFC748, so somebody please explain:
> 
> 1. Whats the point.
> 
> 2. How dows this help.
> 
> 3. How much will it help.
> 
> Poul-Henning
> 
> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 09:34:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:37 GMT