Sitting here with Roy, who's asking much the same question. James, I know there was a discussion about this a while back, but it's new to many; can you give an overview? Cheers, On 29/03/2011, at 11:31 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <B27105DD-AFD1-451C-B9D7-ED79888A657B@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri > tes: > >>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-http-prefer-03.txt > > Couldt we please try to make it a habit to include some kind of use-case > or justification for these "bolt-on" drafts ? > > It's probably my imagination that is flawed, but the only mental connection > I can attach to this draft is RFC748, so somebody please explain: > > 1. Whats the point. > > 2. How dows this help. > > 3. How much will it help. > > Poul-Henning > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 09:34:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:37 GMT