W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Implementation experience feeding into http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-pipeline-01.txt?

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:29:01 +0200
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <7331AA66-1822-4E41-ABB1-26DE277CBF43@mnot.net>
To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
Hi Mike,

I've been talking with Patrick McManus from Mozilla about it fairly often, and they're working on pipelining pretty aggressively. 

See:
  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603503 <-- [meta] tracking bug
  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603506 <-- Blacklisting Origin Servers
  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603505 <-- Discovering Faulty Proxies
  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597684 <-- Correlating Responses
  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=602518 <-- Hinting for XHR

They're having good results so far; e.g., this is a visualisation of a pcap that Patrick sent to me (reproduced with permission):




I see this draft as very much a living document (and still quite a young one). If you have any suggestions, data, feedback, etc. it's more than welcome. 

Cheers,


On 25/03/2011, at 7:49 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:

> Hi Mark -
> 
> I'm wondering if any implementation data fed into this draft?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/





Screen_shot_2011-03-08_at_9.00.40_AM.png
(image/png attachment: Screen_shot_2011-03-08_at_9.00.40_AM.png)

Received on Sunday, 27 March 2011 14:29:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:37 GMT