W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Content-Disposition: *sender* advice

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:21:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4D64EDBF.70903@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 23.02.2011 11:43, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> (3) isn't ideal, but it does perform as advertised; i.e., the UA falls back to the filename parameter.

Well, Firefox does not "fall back", it "trips over".

This would mean that we recommend a format that breaks the UA which has 
been doing the "right thing" since "ever", just because some *other* UAs 
do not.

I don't think we should do that, at least not until 
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588781> is fixed. So I'd 
prefer no advice over bad advice here.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 11:22:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:37 GMT