- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:52:47 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Le 9 févr. 2011 à 19:32, Mark Nottingham a écrit : > Consuming implementations MAY take steps to recover a usable field-value from an invalid header field, but SHOULD NOT reject the message outright, unless this is explicitly desirable behaviour (e.g., the implementation is a validator). As such, the default handling of invalid fields is to ignore them. Proposal: ---8<--- Consuming implementations MAY fix an invalid header field into a usable field-value. Consuming implementations SHOULD NOT reject the message. Note: For some specific class of products, implementations might need to behave differently. (e.g., the implementation is a validator). As such, the default handling of invalid fields is to ignore them. ---8<--- -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
Received on Friday, 11 February 2011 15:53:33 UTC