W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Content-Disposition cardinality / priority [was: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined]

From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:37:13 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=PT=-ZJ8E5H=EQH-jDdxF8O7wXEY_W2-M1dnU6@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, httpbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> doesn't seem like there's much consensus among implementers here; unless one forms, I don't think we can say much.

As I've written before, this seems backwards.  How are implementations
to come to consensus if we don't write down a specification for how
they should behave?

Adam
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:38:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:36 GMT