Re: Content-Disposition cardinality / priority [was: TICKET 259: 'treat as invalid' not defined]

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> doesn't seem like there's much consensus among implementers here; unless one forms, I don't think we can say much.

As I've written before, this seems backwards.  How are implementations
to come to consensus if we don't write down a specification for how
they should behave?

Adam