- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:39:10 +1100
- To: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
One more: p7-auth #141 should we have an auth scheme registry <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/141> On 03/02/2011, at 4:19 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Happy New Year, HTTPbis. > > I've realised that we've neglected to formally close the issues related to the -12 drafts, so without further ado: > > General issues > > p1-messaging > #193 Trailer requirements > #248 confusing Date requirements for clients > > p2-semantics > #229 Considerations for new status codes > #230 Considerations for new methods > #232 User-Agent guidelines > > p3-payload > #123 Factor out Content-Disposition > > p6-cache > #217 Caches can't be required to serve ranges > > p7-auth > #195 auth-param syntax > #237 absorbing the auth framework from 2617 > > See also Julian's change summary: <http://www.w3.org/mid/4CC57FF8.6060605@gmx.de> > > Please have a look. Barring objections, we'll close the relevant issues. > > Issues are linked from <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/15>. > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 08:39:44 UTC